Old 06-17-2009, 03:32 AM
  #106  
waynesworld154
Member
CRAFTSMAN
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 60
Default

For those of you still on the fence and to those of you who are supporting me. I have a few points about the title and why he did not disclose it to me.

1.if the title had a lien on it when it was sold he would not be able to sign it over to me.

2. the lien on the car has been written off which means the loan was not paid and the bank took a loss. Title still shows the credit union as a lien holder according to his ad # 1574778 soooo he couldn't sign the title over to me without owing at the DMV.

3. In firebirds own words (you can go back and read all posting in the forum) the bank wont remove the lean until wayne pays me the 1,000 dollars. We all know the bank doesnt care about wayne. If you have a loan the payment is due when the payment is due. The bank does not have a contract with me and the car would not have been authorized by the bank to sell unless the loan was paid.

We report You decide.......
waynesworld154 is offline